I updated everything to the latest Unity Editor. Also realized I had the wrong shaders on my hairs, those are fixed and the hairs look MUCH better!
3.8 KiB
Generic jobs
Burst compiles a job in two ways:
- In the Editor, it compiles the job when it's scheduled, known as just-in-time (JIT) compilation.
- In a player build, it compiles the job as part of the built player, known as ahead-of-time (AOT) compilation.
For more information, see the documentation on Compilation.
If the job is a concrete type (doesn't use generics), Burst compiles it in both modes (AOT and JIT). However, a generic job might behave in an unexpected way.
While Burst supports generics, it has limited support for generic jobs or function pointers. If you notice that a job scheduled in the Editor is running at full speed, but not in a built player, it's might be a problem related to generic jobs.
The following example defines a generic job:
// Direct generic job
[BurstCompile]
struct MyGenericJob<TData> : IJob where TData : struct {
public void Execute() { ... }
}
You can also nest generic jobs:
// Nested generic job
public class MyGenericSystem<TData> where TData : struct {
[BurstCompile]
struct MyGenericJob : IJob {
public void Execute() { ... }
}
public void Run()
{
var myJob = new MyGenericJob(); // implicitly MyGenericSystem<TData>.MyGenericJob
myJob.Schedule();
}
}
Jobs that aren't Burst compiled look like this:
// Direct Generic Job
var myJob = new MyGenericJob<int>();
myJob.Schedule();
// Nested Generic Job
var myJobSystem = new MyGenericSystem<float>();
myJobSystem.Run();
In both cases, in a player build, the Burst compiler detects that it has to compile MyGenericJob<int>
and MyGenericJob<float>
. This is because the generic jobs (or the type surrounding it for the nested job) are used with fully resolved generic arguments (int
and float
).
However, if these jobs are used indirectly through a generic parameter, the Burst compiler can't detect the jobs it has to compile at player build time:
public static void GenericJobSchedule<TData>() where TData: struct {
// Generic argument: Generic Parameter TData
// This Job won't be detected by the Burst Compiler at standalone-player build time.
var job = new MyGenericJob<TData>();
job.Schedule();
}
// The implicit MyGenericJob<int> will run at Editor time in full Burst speed
// but won't be detected at standalone-player build time.
GenericJobSchedule<int>();
The same restriction applies if you declare the job in the context of generic parameter that comes from a type:
// Generic Parameter TData
public class SuperJobSystem<TData>
{
// Generic argument: Generic Parameter TData
// This Job won't be detected by the Burst Compiler at standalone-player build time.
public MyGenericJob<TData> MyJob;
}
If you want to use generic jobs, you must use them directly with fully resolved generic arguments (for example, int
, MyOtherStruct
). You can't use them with a generic parameter indirection (for example, MyGenericJob<TContext>
).
Important
Burst doesn't support scheduling generic Jobs through generic methods. While this works in the Editor, it doesn't work in the standalone player.
Function pointers
Function pointers are restricted because you can't use a generic delegate through a function pointer with Burst:
public delegate void MyGenericDelegate<T>(ref TData data) where TData: struct;
var myGenericDelegate = new MyGenericDelegate<int>(MyIntDelegateImpl);
// Will fail to compile this function pointer.
var myGenericFunctionPointer = BurstCompiler.CompileFunctionPointer<MyGenericDelegate<int>>(myGenericDelegate);
This limitation is because of a limitation of the .NET runtime to interop with such delegates.
For more information, see the documentation on Function pointers.